China vs Eastern Europe: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- China
- Eastern Europe
How they compare
Eastern Europe currently reports 176,917 t against 114,662 t in China, a difference of 62,255 t.
That makes Eastern Europe's figure about 1.5 times China's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Eastern Europe has been ahead every year.
China ranks 3rd and Eastern Europe ranks 6th of 201 countries.
Eastern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Eastern Europe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 109,425 t | 265,138 t | 155,713 t | Eastern Europe |
| 1970s | 109,195 t | 255,051 t | 145,856 t | Eastern Europe |
| 1980s | 113,046 t | 236,244 t | 123,198 t | Eastern Europe |
| 1990s | 117,806 t | 230,998 t | 113,192 t | Eastern Europe |
| 2000s | 116,035 t | 198,545 t | 82,511 t | Eastern Europe |
| 2010s | 109,997 t | 198,334 t | 88,337 t | Eastern Europe |
| 2020s | 115,078 t | 177,069 t | 61,992 t | Eastern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, China or Eastern Europe?
- Eastern Europe, at 176,917 t against 114,662 t in China as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between China and Eastern Europe?
- 62,255 t, with Eastern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Eastern Europe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do China and Eastern Europe rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- China ranks 3rd and Eastern Europe ranks 6th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).