Congo vs Eritrea: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Congo
- Eritrea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 67.22 t against 46.98 t in Congo, a difference of 20.24 t.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.4 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Congo ranks 137th and Eritrea ranks 134th of 186 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31.87 t | 86.05 t | 54.18 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 41.74 t | 65.54 t | 23.8 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 46.16 t | 66.93 t | 20.77 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 49.83 t | 66.88 t | 17.05 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Congo or Eritrea?
- Eritrea, at 67.22 t against 46.98 t in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Congo and Eritrea?
- 20.24 t, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Eritrea rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Congo ranks 137th and Eritrea ranks 134th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).