Cook Islands vs Tuvalu: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Cook Islands
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 0.0587 t against 0.0472 t in Cook Islands, a difference of 0.0115 t.
That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.2 times Cook Islands's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cook Islands ahead.
Cook Islands ranks 186th and Tuvalu ranks 185th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cook Islands averaged higher in 6 and Tuvalu in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3621 t | 0.0968 t | 0.2653 t | Cook Islands |
| 1970s | 0.3066 t | 0.0683 t | 0.2383 t | Cook Islands |
| 1980s | 0.2284 t | 0.0712 t | 0.1572 t | Cook Islands |
| 1990s | 0.1157 t | 0.0485 t | 0.0673 t | Cook Islands |
| 2000s | 0.0767 t | 0.0444 t | 0.0323 t | Cook Islands |
| 2010s | 0.0478 t | 0.0454 t | 0.0024 t | Cook Islands |
| 2020s | 0.0472 t | 0.0628 t | 0.0156 t | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Cook Islands or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 0.0587 t against 0.0472 t in Cook Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Cook Islands and Tuvalu?
- 0.0115 t, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Tuvalu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cook Islands and Tuvalu rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Cook Islands ranks 186th and Tuvalu ranks 185th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).