Costa Rica vs Guyana: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Costa Rica
- Guyana
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 235.94 t against 184.84 t in Guyana, a difference of 51.1 t.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.3 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 126th and Guyana ranks 129th of 201 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 191.28 t | 81 t | 110.28 t | Costa Rica |
| 1970s | 216.55 t | 83.02 t | 133.53 t | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 214.52 t | 78.56 t | 135.96 t | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 194.06 t | 84.97 t | 109.09 t | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 182.22 t | 98.57 t | 83.64 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 171.01 t | 131.89 t | 39.12 t | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 342.47 t | 186.33 t | 156.14 t | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Costa Rica or Guyana?
- Costa Rica, at 235.94 t against 184.84 t in Guyana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Costa Rica and Guyana?
- 51.1 t, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Guyana?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Guyana rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Costa Rica ranks 126th and Guyana ranks 129th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).