Côte d'Ivoire vs Middle Africa: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Middle Africa
How they compare
Middle Africa currently reports 9,203 t against 6,487 t in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 2,716 t.
That makes Middle Africa's figure about 1.4 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Middle Africa has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 25th and Middle Africa ranks 4th of 29 groups.
Middle Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Middle Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,265 t | 4,406 t | 3,141 t | Middle Africa |
| 1970s | 1,779 t | 4,708 t | 2,929 t | Middle Africa |
| 1980s | 2,557 t | 4,340 t | 1,783 t | Middle Africa |
| 1990s | 3,246 t | 4,946 t | 1,700 t | Middle Africa |
| 2000s | 4,167 t | 6,583 t | 2,416 t | Middle Africa |
| 2010s | 5,208 t | 8,713 t | 3,505 t | Middle Africa |
| 2020s | 6,284 t | 9,006 t | 2,722 t | Middle Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Côte d'Ivoire or Middle Africa?
- Middle Africa, at 9,203 t against 6,487 t in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Côte d'Ivoire and Middle Africa?
- 2,716 t, with Middle Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Middle Africa?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Middle Africa rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 25th and Middle Africa ranks 4th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).