Croatia vs Sri Lanka: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Croatia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 612.09 t against 547.24 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 64.85 t.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 100th and Sri Lanka ranks 103rd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 932.24 t | 643.83 t | 288.41 t | Croatia |
| 2000s | 627.64 t | 633.86 t | 6.22 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 409.3 t | 604.08 t | 194.78 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 558.12 t | 565.14 t | 7.02 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Croatia or Sri Lanka?
- Croatia, at 612.09 t against 547.24 t in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Croatia and Sri Lanka?
- 64.85 t, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Sri Lanka?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Sri Lanka rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Croatia ranks 100th and Sri Lanka ranks 103rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).