Croatia vs Uruguay: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Croatia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 631 t against 612.09 t in Croatia, a difference of 18.91 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 100th and Uruguay ranks 98th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 932.24 t | 390.74 t | 541.5 t | Croatia |
| 2000s | 627.64 t | 747.69 t | 120.04 t | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 409.3 t | 1,510 t | 1,101 t | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 558.12 t | 1,068 t | 509.52 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Croatia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 631 t against 612.09 t in Croatia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Croatia and Uruguay?
- 18.91 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Uruguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Uruguay rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Croatia ranks 100th and Uruguay ranks 98th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).