Cuba vs Togo: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Cuba
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 497.79 t against 482.05 t in Cuba, a difference of 15.74 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 95th and Togo ranks 94th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Togo in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 358.94 t | 242.94 t | 116 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 347.45 t | 257.56 t | 89.89 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 387.58 t | 311.52 t | 76.06 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 429.36 t | 448.48 t | 19.12 t | Togo |
| 2000s | 415.07 t | 475.99 t | 60.92 t | Togo |
| 2010s | 457.9 t | 497.79 t | 39.9 t | Togo |
| 2020s | 482.05 t | 497.79 t | 15.74 t | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Cuba or Togo?
- Togo, at 497.79 t against 482.05 t in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Cuba and Togo?
- 15.74 t, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Togo?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Togo rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Cuba ranks 95th and Togo ranks 94th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).