Czechia vs Iraq: Seed — Cropland potassium

Czechia
1,945 t
in 2023
Iraq
1,955 t
in 2023
Czechia rank
64th
Iraq rank
62nd

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Czechia
  • Iraq
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 1,955 t against 1,945 t in Czechia, a difference of 10 t.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 64th and Iraq ranks 62nd of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Iraq in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Iraq Difference Ahead
1990s 3,295 t 2,161 t 1,133 t Czechia
2000s 2,607 t 2,859 t 251.43 t Iraq
2010s 2,233 t 2,306 t 72.89 t Iraq
2020s 2,068 t 2,532 t 463.45 t Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Czechia or Iraq?
Iraq, at 1,955 t against 1,945 t in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Czechia and Iraq?
10 t, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Iraq?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Iraq rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Czechia ranks 64th and Iraq ranks 62nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).