Czechia vs Kyrgyzstan: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Czechia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 1,945 t against 1,910 t in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 35 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 56th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 57th of 185 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,295 t | 1,180 t | 2,115 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 2,607 t | 1,975 t | 632.2 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 2,233 t | 2,015 t | 218.47 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 2,068 t | 2,032 t | 36.04 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Czechia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Czechia, at 1,945 t against 1,910 t in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Czechia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 35 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Czechia ranks 56th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 57th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).