Czechoslovakia vs Mexico: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Mexico
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 2,695 t against 2,591 t in Mexico, a difference of 104 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Czechoslovakia ahead.
Czechoslovakia ranks 45th and Mexico ranks 47th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechoslovakia averaged higher in 2 and Mexico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,466 t | 4,344 t | 4,122 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 5,711 t | 4,278 t | 1,433 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 3,761 t | 4,806 t | 1,045 t | Mexico |
| 1990s | 2,636 t | 4,166 t | 1,530 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Czechoslovakia or Mexico?
- Czechoslovakia, at 2,695 t against 2,591 t in Mexico as of 1992.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Czechoslovakia and Mexico?
- 104 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Mexico?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Mexico rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 45th and Mexico ranks 47th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).