Czechoslovakia vs Peru: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 4,060 t against 2,695 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 1,365 t.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.5 times Czechoslovakia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 37th and Peru ranks 34th of 186 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8,466 t | 2,278 t | 6,188 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 5,711 t | 2,144 t | 3,567 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 3,761 t | 2,166 t | 1,594 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 2,636 t | 2,030 t | 605.06 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Czechoslovakia or Peru?
- Peru, at 4,060 t against 2,695 t in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Czechoslovakia and Peru?
- 1,365 t, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Peru?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Peru rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 37th and Peru ranks 34th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).