Dominica vs Papua New Guinea: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Dominica
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 19.41 t against 13.19 t in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 6.22 t.
That makes Dominica's figure about 1.5 times Papua New Guinea's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Dominica has been ahead every year.
Dominica ranks 144th and Papua New Guinea ranks 147th of 185 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.8 t | 0 t | 5.8 t | Dominica |
| 1970s | 5.8 t | 0 t | 5.8 t | Dominica |
| 1980s | 6.38 t | 0 t | 6.38 t | Dominica |
| 1990s | 6.52 t | 0 t | 6.52 t | Dominica |
| 2000s | 13.53 t | 0 t | 13.53 t | Dominica |
| 2010s | 19.41 t | 10.55 t | 8.86 t | Dominica |
| 2020s | 19.41 t | 13.19 t | 6.22 t | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Dominica or Papua New Guinea?
- Dominica, at 19.41 t against 13.19 t in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Dominica and Papua New Guinea?
- 6.22 t, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Papua New Guinea?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Papua New Guinea rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Dominica ranks 144th and Papua New Guinea ranks 147th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).