Eastern Africa vs Romania: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Eastern Africa
- Romania
How they compare
Eastern Africa currently reports 27,328 t against 9,121 t in Romania, a difference of 18,207 t.
That makes Eastern Africa's figure about 3.0 times Romania's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Eastern Africa has been ahead every year.
Eastern Africa ranks 19th and Romania ranks 17th of 32 groups.
Eastern Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Africa | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12,120 t | 7,569 t | 4,551 t | Eastern Africa |
| 1970s | 13,306 t | 8,703 t | 4,602 t | Eastern Africa |
| 1980s | 14,024 t | 10,708 t | 3,316 t | Eastern Africa |
| 1990s | 15,487 t | 10,447 t | 5,040 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2000s | 19,717 t | 9,266 t | 10,451 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2010s | 21,987 t | 8,920 t | 13,066 t | Eastern Africa |
| 2020s | 26,648 t | 7,930 t | 18,718 t | Eastern Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Eastern Africa or Romania?
- Eastern Africa, at 27,328 t against 9,121 t in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Eastern Africa and Romania?
- 18,207 t, with Eastern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Africa and Romania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Africa and Romania rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Eastern Africa ranks 19th and Romania ranks 17th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).