Eastern Asia vs Russian Federation: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Eastern Asia
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Eastern Asia currently reports 118,811 t against 97,324 t in Russian Federation, a difference of 21,487 t.
That makes Eastern Asia's figure about 1.2 times Russian Federation's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Eastern Asia ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 5th of 29 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eastern Asia averaged higher in 3 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 122,962 t | 125,872 t | 2,910 t | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 120,218 t | 106,645 t | 13,573 t | Eastern Asia |
| 2010s | 114,406 t | 108,769 t | 5,638 t | Eastern Asia |
| 2020s | 119,206 t | 97,008 t | 22,198 t | Eastern Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Eastern Asia or Russian Federation?
- Eastern Asia, at 118,811 t against 97,324 t in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Eastern Asia and Russian Federation?
- 21,487 t, with Eastern Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Asia and Russian Federation rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Eastern Asia ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 5th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).