Eastern Europe vs India: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Eastern Europe
- India
How they compare
Eastern Europe currently reports 176,917 t against 137,857 t in India, a difference of 39,060 t.
That makes Eastern Europe's figure about 1.3 times India's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Eastern Europe has been ahead every year.
Eastern Europe ranks 5th and India ranks 2nd of 29 groups.
Eastern Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Europe | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 265,138 t | 58,379 t | 206,759 t | Eastern Europe |
| 1970s | 255,051 t | 70,751 t | 184,299 t | Eastern Europe |
| 1980s | 236,244 t | 85,063 t | 151,182 t | Eastern Europe |
| 1990s | 230,998 t | 90,528 t | 140,471 t | Eastern Europe |
| 2000s | 198,545 t | 99,566 t | 98,980 t | Eastern Europe |
| 2010s | 198,334 t | 115,289 t | 83,044 t | Eastern Europe |
| 2020s | 177,069 t | 126,552 t | 50,517 t | Eastern Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Eastern Europe or India?
- Eastern Europe, at 176,917 t against 137,857 t in India as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Eastern Europe and India?
- 39,060 t, with Eastern Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Europe and India?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Eastern Europe and India rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Eastern Europe ranks 5th and India ranks 2nd of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).