Ecuador vs Lebanon: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Ecuador
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 167.68 t against 159.12 t in Ecuador, a difference of 8.56 t.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 133rd and Lebanon ranks 132nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and Lebanon in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 594.7 t | 103.32 t | 491.38 t | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 501.13 t | 90.02 t | 411.11 t | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 549.96 t | 91.66 t | 458.3 t | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 763.18 t | 119.65 t | 643.53 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 684.52 t | 146.47 t | 538.05 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 237.95 t | 129.32 t | 108.63 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 165.26 t | 172.83 t | 7.58 t | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Ecuador or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 167.68 t against 159.12 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Ecuador and Lebanon?
- 8.56 t, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Lebanon?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Lebanon rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Ecuador ranks 133rd and Lebanon ranks 132nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).