Ecuador vs Mauritania: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Ecuador
- Mauritania
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 159.12 t against 128.06 t in Mauritania, a difference of 31.06 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Mauritania's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 133rd and Mauritania ranks 136th of 201 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 594.7 t | 61.05 t | 533.65 t | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 501.13 t | 50.45 t | 450.69 t | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 549.96 t | 63.35 t | 486.61 t | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 763.18 t | 84.08 t | 679.1 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 684.52 t | 71.57 t | 612.95 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 237.95 t | 109.95 t | 128.01 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 165.26 t | 131.19 t | 34.07 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Ecuador or Mauritania?
- Ecuador, at 159.12 t against 128.06 t in Mauritania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Ecuador and Mauritania?
- 31.06 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mauritania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Mauritania rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Ecuador ranks 133rd and Mauritania ranks 136th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).