El Salvador vs Sierra Leone: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- El Salvador
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 508.06 t against 481.69 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 26.37 t.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
El Salvador ranks 93rd and Sierra Leone ranks 96th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Sierra Leone in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 174.47 t | 302.26 t | 127.79 t | Sierra Leone |
| 1970s | 266.08 t | 318.27 t | 52.19 t | Sierra Leone |
| 1980s | 235.42 t | 322.34 t | 86.93 t | Sierra Leone |
| 1990s | 285.03 t | 318.37 t | 33.34 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2000s | 364.34 t | 404.97 t | 40.63 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 536.69 t | 414.99 t | 121.7 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 518.95 t | 493.2 t | 25.75 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, El Salvador or Sierra Leone?
- El Salvador, at 508.06 t against 481.69 t in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between El Salvador and Sierra Leone?
- 26.37 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Sierra Leone?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Sierra Leone rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- El Salvador ranks 93rd and Sierra Leone ranks 96th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).