El Salvador vs Zimbabwe: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- El Salvador
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 583.65 t against 508.06 t in El Salvador, a difference of 75.59 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
El Salvador ranks 104th and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 174.47 t | 431.52 t | 257.05 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1970s | 266.08 t | 572.51 t | 306.43 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 235.42 t | 704.34 t | 468.92 t | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 285.03 t | 769.9 t | 484.87 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 364.34 t | 836.34 t | 472 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 536.69 t | 527.31 t | 9.38 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 518.95 t | 598.16 t | 79.22 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, El Salvador or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 583.65 t against 508.06 t in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
- 75.59 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Zimbabwe?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Zimbabwe rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- El Salvador ranks 104th and Zimbabwe ranks 102nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).