Eritrea vs Jordan: Seed — Cropland potassium

Eritrea
67.22 t
in 2023
Jordan
67.28 t
in 2023
Eritrea rank
145th
Jordan rank
144th

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Eritrea
  • Jordan
50100150200250196119922023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 67.28 t against 67.22 t in Eritrea, a difference of 0.06 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Jordan ahead.

Eritrea ranks 145th and Jordan ranks 144th of 201 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Jordan Difference Ahead
1990s 86.05 t 154.29 t 68.25 t Jordan
2000s 65.54 t 118.43 t 52.89 t Jordan
2010s 66.93 t 115.38 t 48.45 t Jordan
2020s 66.88 t 79.07 t 12.18 t Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Eritrea or Jordan?
Jordan, at 67.28 t against 67.22 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Eritrea and Jordan?
0.06 t, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Jordan?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Jordan rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Eritrea ranks 145th and Jordan ranks 144th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).