Eritrea vs Lesotho: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Eritrea
- Lesotho
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 67.22 t against 50.03 t in Lesotho, a difference of 17.19 t.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.3 times Lesotho's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 145th and Lesotho ranks 148th of 201 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 86.05 t | 26.43 t | 59.62 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 65.54 t | 30.83 t | 34.71 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 66.93 t | 26.33 t | 40.6 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 66.88 t | 42.4 t | 24.48 t | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Eritrea or Lesotho?
- Eritrea, at 67.22 t against 50.03 t in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Eritrea and Lesotho?
- 17.19 t, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Lesotho?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Lesotho rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Eritrea ranks 145th and Lesotho ranks 148th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).