Eritrea vs Liberia: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Eritrea
- Liberia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 67.44 t against 67.22 t in Eritrea, a difference of 0.22 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 134th and Liberia ranks 132nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 3 and Liberia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 86.05 t | 54.64 t | 31.4 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 65.54 t | 59.14 t | 6.4 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 66.93 t | 65.99 t | 0.9406 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 66.88 t | 69.63 t | 2.75 t | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Eritrea or Liberia?
- Liberia, at 67.44 t against 67.22 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Eritrea and Liberia?
- 0.22 t, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Liberia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Liberia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Eritrea ranks 134th and Liberia ranks 132nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).