Estonia vs Haiti: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Estonia
- Haiti
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 480.29 t against 468.05 t in Estonia, a difference of 12.24 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 109th and Haiti ranks 108th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Haiti in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Haiti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,129 t | 187.64 t | 941.77 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 629.72 t | 203.46 t | 426.27 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 474.63 t | 470.97 t | 3.66 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 485.9 t | 493.32 t | 7.42 t | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Estonia or Haiti?
- Haiti, at 480.29 t against 468.05 t in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Estonia and Haiti?
- 12.24 t, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Haiti?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Haiti rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Estonia ranks 109th and Haiti ranks 108th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).