Estonia vs Ireland: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Estonia
- Ireland
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 468.05 t against 425.9 t in Ireland, a difference of 42.15 t.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 109th and Ireland ranks 111th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Ireland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,129 t | 586.73 t | 542.68 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 629.72 t | 419.43 t | 210.29 t | Estonia |
| 2010s | 474.63 t | 482.55 t | 7.92 t | Ireland |
| 2020s | 485.9 t | 398.8 t | 87.1 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Estonia or Ireland?
- Estonia, at 468.05 t against 425.9 t in Ireland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Estonia and Ireland?
- 42.15 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Ireland?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Ireland rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Estonia ranks 109th and Ireland ranks 111th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).