Estonia vs Portugal: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Estonia
- Portugal
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 468.05 t against 387.37 t in Portugal, a difference of 80.68 t.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.2 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Portugal ahead.
Estonia ranks 109th and Portugal ranks 112th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Portugal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,129 t | 1,069 t | 59.99 t | Estonia |
| 2000s | 629.72 t | 636.11 t | 6.39 t | Portugal |
| 2010s | 474.63 t | 620.58 t | 145.95 t | Portugal |
| 2020s | 485.9 t | 456.99 t | 28.91 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Estonia or Portugal?
- Estonia, at 468.05 t against 387.37 t in Portugal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Estonia and Portugal?
- 80.68 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Portugal?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Portugal rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Estonia ranks 109th and Portugal ranks 112th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).