Ethiopia PDR vs Greece: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Greece
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 2,299 t against 2,125 t in Greece, a difference of 174 t.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Greece's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Greece ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 45th and Greece ranks 48th of 186 countries.
Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Greece | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,491 t | 2,535 t | 43.74 t | Greece |
| 1970s | 2,428 t | 2,523 t | 95.55 t | Greece |
| 1980s | 2,457 t | 2,853 t | 395.64 t | Greece |
| 1990s | 2,385 t | 3,083 t | 698.37 t | Greece |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Ethiopia PDR or Greece?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 2,299 t against 2,125 t in Greece as of 1992.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Ethiopia PDR and Greece?
- 174 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Greece?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Greece rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 45th and Greece ranks 48th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).