Ethiopia vs Mozambique: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia
- Mozambique
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 4,223 t against 3,285 t in Mozambique, a difference of 938 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.3 times Mozambique's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 32nd and Mozambique ranks 35th of 186 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,579 t | 964.35 t | 1,615 t | Ethiopia |
| 2000s | 3,360 t | 1,697 t | 1,663 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 3,617 t | 1,796 t | 1,821 t | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 4,138 t | 2,789 t | 1,350 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Ethiopia or Mozambique?
- Ethiopia, at 4,223 t against 3,285 t in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Ethiopia and Mozambique?
- 938 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Mozambique?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Mozambique rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia ranks 32nd and Mozambique ranks 35th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).