Ethiopia vs Peru: Seed — Cropland potassium

Ethiopia
4,223 t
in 2023
Peru
4,060 t
in 2023
Ethiopia rank
38th
Peru rank
41st

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Peru
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 4,223 t against 4,060 t in Peru, a difference of 163 t.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Peru ahead.

Ethiopia ranks 38th and Peru ranks 41st of 201 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 2,579 t 2,635 t 55.69 t Peru
2000s 3,360 t 4,055 t 695.21 t Peru
2010s 3,617 t 3,973 t 356.65 t Peru
2020s 4,138 t 4,312 t 173.6 t Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Ethiopia or Peru?
Ethiopia, at 4,223 t against 4,060 t in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Ethiopia and Peru?
163 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Peru?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Ethiopia and Peru rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Ethiopia ranks 38th and Peru ranks 41st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).