French Polynesia vs Montenegro: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- French Polynesia
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 5.7 t against 2.22 t in French Polynesia, a difference of 3.48 t.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 2.6 times French Polynesia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 170th and Montenegro ranks 167th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.6 t | 11.4 t | 8.8 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 2.31 t | 1.71 t | 0.5964 t | French Polynesia |
| 2020s | 2.26 t | 8.55 t | 6.29 t | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, French Polynesia or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 5.7 t against 2.22 t in French Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between French Polynesia and Montenegro?
- 3.48 t, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do French Polynesia and Montenegro rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- French Polynesia ranks 170th and Montenegro ranks 167th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).