Grenada vs New Caledonia: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Grenada
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 1.08 t against 0.9614 t in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.1186 t.
That makes Grenada's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 174th and New Caledonia ranks 175th of 201 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.31 t | 1.39 t | 0.0746 t | New Caledonia |
| 1970s | 1.25 t | 1.32 t | 0.0675 t | New Caledonia |
| 1980s | 1.21 t | 1.49 t | 0.2774 t | New Caledonia |
| 1990s | 1.1 t | 1.68 t | 0.5814 t | New Caledonia |
| 2000s | 1.06 t | 1.36 t | 0.305 t | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 1.28 t | 1.39 t | 0.1041 t | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 1.06 t | 1.43 t | 0.3652 t | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Grenada or New Caledonia?
- Grenada, at 1.08 t against 0.9614 t in New Caledonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Grenada and New Caledonia?
- 0.1186 t, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and New Caledonia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and New Caledonia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Grenada ranks 174th and New Caledonia ranks 175th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).