Guatemala vs Sweden: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Guatemala
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 1,171 t against 1,034 t in Guatemala, a difference of 137 t.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 87th and Sweden ranks 85th of 201 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 588.48 t | 2,514 t | 1,925 t | Sweden |
| 1970s | 627.77 t | 2,273 t | 1,645 t | Sweden |
| 1980s | 627.79 t | 2,194 t | 1,566 t | Sweden |
| 1990s | 574.03 t | 1,785 t | 1,211 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 602.84 t | 1,494 t | 891.02 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 816.15 t | 1,332 t | 515.72 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 1,074 t | 1,190 t | 115.86 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Guatemala or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 1,171 t against 1,034 t in Guatemala as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Guatemala and Sweden?
- 137 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Sweden rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Guatemala ranks 87th and Sweden ranks 85th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).