Guinea-Bissau vs Panama: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Panama
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 79.53 t against 69.64 t in Panama, a difference of 9.89 t.
That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 139th and Panama ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 81.32 t | 61.76 t | 19.56 t | Guinea-Bissau |
| 1970s | 80.31 t | 60.32 t | 19.99 t | Guinea-Bissau |
| 1980s | 75.35 t | 96.34 t | 20.99 t | Panama |
| 1990s | 63.95 t | 79.15 t | 15.2 t | Panama |
| 2000s | 67.01 t | 74.76 t | 7.75 t | Panama |
| 2010s | 69.47 t | 97.39 t | 27.91 t | Panama |
| 2020s | 74.71 t | 97.7 t | 22.99 t | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Guinea-Bissau or Panama?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 79.53 t against 69.64 t in Panama as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Guinea-Bissau and Panama?
- 9.89 t, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Panama?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Panama rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 139th and Panama ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).