Honduras vs Libya: Seed — Cropland potassium

Honduras
328.08 t
in 2023
Libya
319.19 t
in 2023
Honduras rank
116th
Libya rank
118th

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Honduras
  • Libya
100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 328.08 t against 319.19 t in Libya, a difference of 8.89 t.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.

Honduras ranks 116th and Libya ranks 118th of 201 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Libya Difference Ahead
1960s 124.14 t 449.59 t 325.46 t Libya
1970s 161.06 t 449.59 t 288.54 t Libya
1980s 239.87 t 449.59 t 209.73 t Libya
1990s 283.53 t 449.59 t 166.07 t Libya
2000s 356.53 t 449.59 t 93.06 t Libya
2010s 321.48 t 413.89 t 92.42 t Libya
2020s 319.86 t 327.92 t 8.06 t Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Honduras or Libya?
Honduras, at 328.08 t against 319.19 t in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Honduras and Libya?
8.89 t, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Libya?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Honduras and Libya rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Honduras ranks 116th and Libya ranks 118th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).