Hungary vs Iraq: Seed — Cropland potassium

Hungary
2,037 t
in 2023
Iraq
1,955 t
in 2023
Hungary rank
60th
Iraq rank
62nd

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Hungary
  • Iraq
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 2,037 t against 1,955 t in Iraq, a difference of 82 t.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 60th and Iraq ranks 62nd of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 5 and Iraq in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Iraq Difference Ahead
1960s 5,778 t 1,586 t 4,192 t Hungary
1970s 4,682 t 1,338 t 3,344 t Hungary
1980s 4,445 t 1,630 t 2,815 t Hungary
1990s 3,394 t 2,289 t 1,104 t Hungary
2000s 2,207 t 2,859 t 652.04 t Iraq
2010s 2,457 t 2,306 t 151.29 t Hungary
2020s 2,176 t 2,532 t 355.61 t Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Hungary or Iraq?
Hungary, at 2,037 t against 1,955 t in Iraq as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Hungary and Iraq?
82 t, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Iraq?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Iraq rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Hungary ranks 60th and Iraq ranks 62nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).