Iceland vs Qatar: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Iceland
- Qatar
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0.0018 t against 0.0018 t in Qatar, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 193rd and Qatar ranks 193rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 6 and Qatar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.43 t | 0.0018 t | 4.43 t | Iceland |
| 1970s | 5.7 t | 0.0018 t | 5.7 t | Iceland |
| 1980s | 5.7 t | 0.0018 t | 5.7 t | Iceland |
| 1990s | 6.27 t | 0.0018 t | 6.27 t | Iceland |
| 2000s | 5.7 t | 0.0018 t | 5.7 t | Iceland |
| 2010s | 0.5707 t | 0.0018 t | 0.5689 t | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.0018 t | 0.0022 t | 0.0004 t | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Iceland or Qatar?
- Iceland, at 0.0018 t against 0.0018 t in Qatar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Iceland and Qatar?
- 0 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Qatar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Qatar rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Iceland ranks 193rd and Qatar ranks 193rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).