Indonesia vs Nepal: Seed — Cropland potassium

Indonesia
2,531 t
in 2023
Nepal
2,491 t
in 2023
Indonesia rank
49th
Nepal rank
51st

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Indonesia
  • Nepal
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 2,531 t against 2,491 t in Nepal, a difference of 40 t.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 49th and Nepal ranks 51st of 201 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 6,120 t 800.65 t 5,320 t Indonesia
1970s 6,076 t 905.2 t 5,170 t Indonesia
1980s 6,545 t 1,267 t 5,278 t Indonesia
1990s 6,958 t 1,615 t 5,343 t Indonesia
2000s 6,871 t 2,053 t 4,817 t Indonesia
2010s 5,537 t 2,465 t 3,071 t Indonesia
2020s 2,656 t 2,492 t 163.75 t Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Indonesia or Nepal?
Indonesia, at 2,531 t against 2,491 t in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Indonesia and Nepal?
40 t, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Nepal rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Indonesia ranks 49th and Nepal ranks 51st of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).