Jordan vs Liberia: Seed — Cropland potassium

Jordan
67.28 t
in 2023
Liberia
67.44 t
in 2023
Jordan rank
144th
Liberia rank
143rd

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Jordan
  • Liberia
50100150200250196119922023

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 67.44 t against 67.28 t in Jordan, a difference of 0.16 t.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 144th and Liberia ranks 143rd of 201 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Liberia Difference Ahead
1960s 201.98 t 52.65 t 149.32 t Jordan
1970s 143.38 t 55.43 t 87.95 t Jordan
1980s 104.08 t 63.21 t 40.87 t Jordan
1990s 149.64 t 53.85 t 95.79 t Jordan
2000s 118.43 t 59.14 t 59.29 t Jordan
2010s 115.38 t 65.99 t 49.39 t Jordan
2020s 79.07 t 69.63 t 9.44 t Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Jordan or Liberia?
Liberia, at 67.44 t against 67.28 t in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Jordan and Liberia?
0.16 t, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Liberia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Liberia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Jordan ranks 144th and Liberia ranks 143rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).