Jordan vs Melanesia: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Jordan
- Melanesia
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 67.28 t against 60.21 t in Melanesia, a difference of 7.07 t.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Melanesia's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 144th and Melanesia ranks 146th of 201 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Melanesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 201.98 t | 21.94 t | 180.04 t | Jordan |
| 1970s | 143.38 t | 24.18 t | 119.2 t | Jordan |
| 1980s | 104.08 t | 29.23 t | 74.85 t | Jordan |
| 1990s | 149.64 t | 29.44 t | 120.2 t | Jordan |
| 2000s | 118.43 t | 30.49 t | 87.94 t | Jordan |
| 2010s | 115.38 t | 48.58 t | 66.8 t | Jordan |
| 2020s | 79.07 t | 58.11 t | 20.96 t | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Jordan or Melanesia?
- Jordan, at 67.28 t against 60.21 t in Melanesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Jordan and Melanesia?
- 7.07 t, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Melanesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and Melanesia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Jordan ranks 144th and Melanesia ranks 146th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).