Jordan vs South Sudan: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Jordan
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 70.75 t against 67.28 t in Jordan, a difference of 3.47 t.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Jordan ranks 144th and South Sudan ranks 141st of 201 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 111.46 t | 67.59 t | 43.87 t | Jordan |
| 2020s | 79.07 t | 71.49 t | 7.58 t | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Jordan or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 70.75 t against 67.28 t in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Jordan and South Sudan?
- 3.47 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Jordan and South Sudan rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Jordan ranks 144th and South Sudan ranks 141st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).