Kazakhstan vs Pakistan: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Kazakhstan
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 24,101 t against 13,925 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 10,176 t.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.7 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 12th and Pakistan ranks 9th of 201 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15,594 t | 17,947 t | 2,353 t | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 13,219 t | 19,919 t | 6,700 t | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 15,164 t | 21,854 t | 6,690 t | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 14,446 t | 23,643 t | 9,197 t | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Kazakhstan or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 24,101 t against 13,925 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Kazakhstan and Pakistan?
- 10,176 t, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Pakistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Pakistan rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Kazakhstan ranks 12th and Pakistan ranks 9th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).