Kenya vs Mexico: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Kenya
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 2,591 t against 2,518 t in Kenya, a difference of 73 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Kenya ranks 50th and Mexico ranks 47th of 201 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 700 t | 4,344 t | 3,644 t | Mexico |
| 1970s | 882.21 t | 4,278 t | 3,396 t | Mexico |
| 1980s | 1,048 t | 4,806 t | 3,758 t | Mexico |
| 1990s | 1,140 t | 4,336 t | 3,196 t | Mexico |
| 2000s | 1,204 t | 3,820 t | 2,616 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 1,570 t | 3,408 t | 1,838 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 2,291 t | 3,112 t | 821.11 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Kenya or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 2,591 t against 2,518 t in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Kenya and Mexico?
- 73 t, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Mexico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Mexico rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Kenya ranks 50th and Mexico ranks 47th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).