Kuwait vs United Arab Emirates: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Kuwait
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 0.0125 t against 0.0107 t in Kuwait, a difference of 0.0018 t.
That makes United Arab Emirates's figure about 1.2 times Kuwait's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Kuwait ranks 190th and United Arab Emirates ranks 189th of 201 countries.
Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1970s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 1980s | 0.0018 t | 0.0013 t | 0.0005 t | Kuwait |
| 1990s | 2.85 t | 0.0025 t | 2.85 t | Kuwait |
| 2000s | 5.7 t | 0.0038 t | 5.7 t | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 7.42 t | 0.0086 t | 7.41 t | Kuwait |
| 2020s | 2.86 t | 0.012 t | 2.85 t | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Kuwait or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 0.0125 t against 0.0107 t in Kuwait as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Kuwait and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.0018 t, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and United Arab Emirates?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kuwait and United Arab Emirates rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Kuwait ranks 190th and United Arab Emirates ranks 189th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).