Kyrgyzstan vs Uganda: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Uganda
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 1,910 t against 1,856 t in Uganda, a difference of 54 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uganda ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 65th and Uganda ranks 66th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,125 t | 1,499 t | 373.77 t | Uganda |
| 2000s | 1,975 t | 1,771 t | 204.38 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 2,015 t | 1,572 t | 442.55 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 2,032 t | 2,137 t | 104.46 t | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Kyrgyzstan or Uganda?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 1,910 t against 1,856 t in Uganda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Kyrgyzstan and Uganda?
- 54 t, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Uganda?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Uganda rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 65th and Uganda ranks 66th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).