Lebanon vs Malaysia: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Lebanon
- Malaysia
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 167.68 t against 130.48 t in Malaysia, a difference of 37.2 t.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.3 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malaysia ahead.
Lebanon ranks 132nd and Malaysia ranks 134th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 2 and Malaysia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 103.32 t | 171.42 t | 68.11 t | Malaysia |
| 1970s | 90.02 t | 150.03 t | 60.01 t | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 91.66 t | 138.41 t | 46.76 t | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 119.65 t | 144.28 t | 24.63 t | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 146.47 t | 136.17 t | 10.3 t | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 129.32 t | 144.15 t | 14.83 t | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 172.83 t | 138.36 t | 34.47 t | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Lebanon or Malaysia?
- Lebanon, at 167.68 t against 130.48 t in Malaysia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Lebanon and Malaysia?
- 37.2 t, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Malaysia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Lebanon and Malaysia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Lebanon ranks 132nd and Malaysia ranks 134th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).