Liberia vs Panama: Seed — Cropland potassium

Liberia
67.44 t
in 2023
Panama
69.64 t
in 2023
Liberia rank
143rd
Panama rank
142nd

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Liberia
  • Panama
406080100120140196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 69.64 t against 67.44 t in Liberia, a difference of 2.2 t.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.

Liberia ranks 143rd and Panama ranks 142nd of 201 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 52.65 t 61.76 t 9.11 t Panama
1970s 55.43 t 60.32 t 4.89 t Panama
1980s 63.21 t 96.34 t 33.13 t Panama
1990s 53.85 t 79.15 t 25.3 t Panama
2000s 59.14 t 74.76 t 15.62 t Panama
2010s 65.99 t 97.39 t 31.4 t Panama
2020s 69.63 t 97.7 t 28.07 t Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Liberia or Panama?
Panama, at 69.64 t against 67.44 t in Liberia as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Liberia and Panama?
2.2 t, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Panama?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Liberia and Panama rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Liberia ranks 143rd and Panama ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).