Libya vs North Macedonia: Seed — Cropland potassium

Libya
319.19 t
in 2023
North Macedonia
310.76 t
in 2023
Libya rank
118th
North Macedonia rank
119th

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Libya
  • North Macedonia
0100200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 319.19 t against 310.76 t in North Macedonia, a difference of 8.43 t.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.

Libya ranks 118th and North Macedonia ranks 119th of 201 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 449.59 t 408.95 t 40.64 t Libya
2000s 449.59 t 398.56 t 51.04 t Libya
2010s 413.89 t 342.86 t 71.04 t Libya
2020s 327.92 t 312.22 t 15.71 t Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Libya or North Macedonia?
Libya, at 319.19 t against 310.76 t in North Macedonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Libya and North Macedonia?
8.43 t, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and North Macedonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Libya and North Macedonia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Libya ranks 118th and North Macedonia ranks 119th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).