Mali vs Senegal: Seed — Cropland potassium

Mali
1,459 t
in 2023
Senegal
1,451 t
in 2023
Mali rank
77th
Senegal rank
78th

Seed — Cropland potassium over time

  • Mali
  • Senegal
5001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922023

How they compare

Mali currently reports 1,459 t against 1,451 t in Senegal, a difference of 8 t.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Senegal ahead.

Mali ranks 77th and Senegal ranks 78th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 2 and Senegal in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Senegal Difference Ahead
1960s 445.82 t 1,620 t 1,175 t Senegal
1970s 552.96 t 2,116 t 1,563 t Senegal
1980s 743.67 t 2,048 t 1,305 t Senegal
1990s 1,424 t 1,850 t 425.67 t Senegal
2000s 1,807 t 1,776 t 31.61 t Mali
2010s 1,459 t 1,362 t 97.54 t Mali
2020s 1,459 t 1,957 t 497.86 t Senegal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Mali or Senegal?
Mali, at 1,459 t against 1,451 t in Senegal as of 2023.
What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Mali and Senegal?
8 t, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Senegal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mali and Senegal rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
Mali ranks 77th and Senegal ranks 78th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Seed — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,483 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).