Mongolia vs Switzerland: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Mongolia
- Switzerland
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 254.42 t against 247.77 t in Switzerland, a difference of 6.65 t.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Switzerland ahead.
Mongolia ranks 122nd and Switzerland ranks 125th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 3 and Switzerland in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 214.09 t | 720.87 t | 506.78 t | Switzerland |
| 1970s | 315.47 t | 521.66 t | 206.19 t | Switzerland |
| 1980s | 551.87 t | 491.2 t | 60.67 t | Mongolia |
| 1990s | 405.72 t | 406.26 t | 0.5439 t | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 210.35 t | 297.64 t | 87.29 t | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 298.76 t | 273.46 t | 25.3 t | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 257.33 t | 256.09 t | 1.24 t | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Mongolia or Switzerland?
- Mongolia, at 254.42 t against 247.77 t in Switzerland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Mongolia and Switzerland?
- 6.65 t, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Switzerland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mongolia and Switzerland rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Mongolia ranks 122nd and Switzerland ranks 125th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).