Montenegro vs Polynesia: Seed — Cropland potassium
Seed — Cropland potassium over time
- Montenegro
- Polynesia
How they compare
Polynesia currently reports 6.25 t against 5.7 t in Montenegro, a difference of 0.55 t.
That makes Polynesia's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 167th and Polynesia ranks 165th of 201 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 2 and Polynesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.4 t | 10.36 t | 1.03 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 1.71 t | 8.41 t | 6.7 t | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 8.55 t | 6.24 t | 2.31 t | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher seed — cropland potassium, Montenegro or Polynesia?
- Polynesia, at 6.25 t against 5.7 t in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in seed — cropland potassium between Montenegro and Polynesia?
- 0.55 t, with Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Polynesia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Polynesia rank globally for seed — cropland potassium?
- Montenegro ranks 167th and Polynesia ranks 165th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Seed — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).